Jesus Christ - the first dissident? - "Historical truth" Prisoner
Soviet camps, historian Michael Heifetz in his book "The Trial of Jesus" proposed extraordinary theory that Jesus Christ - the first dissident in history. However, not all researchers agree with this view of the activity of Christ. &Laquo; Jesus thought out differently than it hadwould do subjected to the Roman Empire, – Michael explains his theory Heifetz. &Ndash; Even in this case it is absolutely similar to the dissidents. Christ said the kingdom of God – within us, and this is above all. The point is not in politics – most dissidents were not engaged in politics. Is Stus in politics? He wrote poetry & raquo ;. Instead mois rector of UCU, dissident Miroslav Marynovych has a different opinion. He believes that Jesus Christ can be considered a dissident only interpretation which suggested that Russian dissident Andrei Almarik &Laquo; Almarik said that dissidents – these are people who are living in non-free country, behaved as if they are free. Jesus Christ did not engage in political issuespit. He said that the true path to freedom – this spiritual liberation & raquo ;, – said Miroslav Marynovych. According to Taras Antoshevskyy religious studies, the position of Jesus does not meet the definition of « & raquo ;. dissident He said that Jesus Christ was not as radical as John the Baptist, and he claims to have not soRoman ac power as the council. &Laquo; very symbolic that in Jesus ’ yizhdzhav oslyati in Jerusalem, that he presented himself as king. At the same time, he spoke of Duty ’ Connection to pay taxes to Caesar. That is why those who first shouted Christ: « Hosanna! & Raquo ;, – Pilate then shouted: « Crucify him! & raquo ;. People like to seein Jesus rebel leader, who overthrow Roman rule. But this was not the Christ & raquo ;. Dissidents of the period can be considered rather Zealotry – social strata then nationalists who sought to overthrow the Roman government. &Laquo; overthrow not really a priority for Jesus, – says Father George Sakvuk. &Ndash; People with this alsounderstand. So when they had to choose between Jesus and Varravoyu, they chose the latter. As a political figure, Jesus probably did not justify their hopes. And he did it on purpose because his priority was the uprising would have a spiritual nature & raquo ;. Therefore, Jesus Christ – as a historical figure who can tell about the life of the Son of God historians, – Sunday, April 12, at 22:30 on Channel ZIK in design « The historical truth of Vakhtang Kipiani & raquo ;.Source: http://artlife.rv.ua/